Back to Intelligence
Research & DataEurope

What this 2026 Zenodo listing can—and cannot—tell sellers about social media trust

A bibliographic record links social media influence, consumer trust and purchase intention in the Indian retail market, but the available evidence contains no abstract, findings or research methods.

Ecomwith EditorialEcommerce intelligence desk

Published
Updated
Risk
low

Reported details

What happened

The record lists Social Media Influence, Consumer Trust and Purchase Intention: A Study of Consumers in the Indian Retail Market as a 2026 work by Ms. Christeena Thomas.

The listed venue is Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), with DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22284170 and OpenAlex ID W7207714119.

The source class is research, but the record's publicationStatus is unknown; it does not establish that the work is peer-reviewed.

The retained evidence is bibliographic metadata only: no abstract, body text, quotation, PDF, methods or results are available.

Business relevance

Why it matters

The title is commercially relevant because it connects social media influence, consumer trust and purchase intention in an Indian retail context, but it does not show how those concepts were measured or related.

Sellers can use the listing as a prompt to review trust signals in social commerce, not as proof that a particular platform, creator tactic or message increases sales.

Treating a discovery record as a research finding would create avoidable planning risk, especially because the publication status is unknown and the source provides no outcome data.

Editorial perspective

Analysis & judgment

  1. The strongest verified takeaway is the research question signalled by the title, not a conclusion. The evidence does not support claims about consumer behaviour or conversion effects.

  2. For an Indian retail seller, the topic may justify a local audit of creator disclosures, reviews, delivery promises and checkout confidence. That is an operational hypothesis derived from the subject matter, not a reported result from the work.

  3. Further evaluation should wait for an abstract or full record that states the design, population, measures and results. Until then, do not convert the listing into a benchmark or causal claim.

Applicability

Seller impact

Social commerce teams may reasonably review whether product pages and creator content make trust-building information easy to verify, provided the review is treated as a general best-practice exercise rather than research validation.

Measurement plans should separate engagement, trust indicators and completed purchases; the supplied record offers no evidence that any one metric predicts another.

Teams operating in India should avoid assuming that this listing represents all Indian consumers or all retail categories, because the available metadata gives no sample or scope details.

Action plan

What to do now

  1. 1

    Label the source correctly

    now

    Record DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22284170 and OpenAlex ID W7207714119 as a research lead with publication status unknown. Do not label it peer-reviewed or cite findings that are not present.

  2. 2

    Audit trust touchpoints

    this-week

    Review social posts, creator disclosures, product pages, reviews, delivery information and checkout messaging for clarity and verifiability. Treat any resulting changes as merchandising or messaging tests, not as evidence from this study.

  3. 3

    Look for a fuller record

    monitor

    Monitor for an abstract, full text or clearer publication-status information before using the work in strategy documents, forecasts or claims about purchase intention.

What not to do yet

  • Do not claim that social media influence increases consumer trust or purchase intention based on this metadata-only record.
  • Do not use the listing to justify a creator budget, platform preference or conversion forecast without separate seller-specific evidence.

Sources & context

Evidence and sources

A source may provide only a headline or summary. Read the evidence scope below. Links and workflow checks are not independent fact verification. Internal confidence values are workflow signals, not probabilities of factual correctness.

  1. 01

    Social Media Influence, Consumer Trust and Purchase Intention: A Study of Consumers in the Indian Retail Market — unknown — Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

    OpenAlex Ecommerce Research Discovery · Workflow status: single-source

    Source link

    Retrieved: September 5, 2026 at 04:17 a.m. UTC

    Bibliographic metadata only; no body, abstract, quotation, or PDF is retained.